Providing an approach to identify and prioritize technology valuation methods in knowledge-based companies
Subject Areas : Strategies for attracting foreign investors for knowledge-based businesses
azam shiri
1
*
,
Mohammadreza Jafari
2
1 - Master's degree, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Imam Javad University (AS), Yazd.
2 - Faculty member
Keywords: Valuation of technology, knowledge base, fuzzy TOPSIS,
Abstract :
Attracting capital in knowledge-based companies in order to manage costs and increase the income that these companies can have has raised the valuation of this company to an important issue from the point of view of entrepreneurs or founders as well as investors. The method of data collection in this survey is field and library. In this research, a comprehensive approach to identify and prioritize the valuation methods of these companies in the technology group, taking into account the reviewed criteria, is presented to unify the views of investors and entrepreneurs, along with the strengths and weaknesses of the final method. . For this purpose, first by reviewing the research literature, all the important and practical valuation methods of these companies have been extracted. In the next step, the effective criteria in the evaluation have been evaluated by the experts with the fuzzy Delphi method according to their application and the ability to implement different methods. Then, the importance of the criteria was determined using the fuzzy hierarchical analysis method. In order to determine the points of the methods in the criteria and also to determine the weaknesses and strengths of the methods, the fuzzy topsis method has been used. According to the results obtained in the technology valuation group, the trading option method with a relative distance of 0.58619 is approved and introduced as a suitable method according to the criteria required by entrepreneurs and investors. Finally, suggestions for improving the final method, trading options, in developing suitable .
1- کرمی غلامرضا ، بیک بشرویه سلمان، تدوین مدل پیاده سازی نظام ارزش های منصفانه در ایران با تأکید بر اندازه گیری، بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی، (4)24، 1396، ص 596-537. https://doi.org/10.22059/acctgrev.2018.245353.1007745#
2- رمضانپور نرگسی، قاسم, هاجری, مهدی, حمیدی, مهدی، رتبه‌بندی روش‌های مناسب ارزشگذاری فناوری‌های زیستی: حوزه تخمیر. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری, 8(4), 1399، ص 169-196. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2021.4065.2445#
3- خرم، مریم، و ترابی، تقی، و طلوعی اشلقی، عباس، بررسی جنبه های اقتصادی تغییرات فناوری در صنعت حفاری با روش MRC.، مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی, 17(68 ), 1400، ص 175-194.#
https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=559139
4- طباطبائیان, سید حبیب الله، غریبی، جلیل، مبانی ارزشگذاری تکنولوژی. تهران: انتشارات مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات صنعتی ایران ، 1386.#
5- Gajek, L., & Kuciński, Ł, Complete discounted cash flow valuation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 73, pp 1-19, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.12.004#
6- Kim .J , Lee .G , Lee .S , Lee. C, Towards expert–machine collaborations for technology valuation: An interpretable machine learning approach,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183,121940, pp 0040-1625, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121940#
7- Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I#
8- Zeng. Weijun, Technology sharing with competitors when facing consumers with uncertain product valuation, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 163, 107815, 0360-8352, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107815#
9- شفیعا، محمدعلی، شاکری، آرنوش و عامری، محسن. مقایسه و تعیین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر انتخاب روش قیمت گذاری فناوری، چهارمین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت فناوری ایران، تهران، 1389. https://civilica.com/doc/94656/#
10- MacMillan, I. C. New business development: A challenge for transformational leadership, Human Resource Management, 26(4), pp 439–454, 1987.#
11- اسلامی بیدگلی، غلامرضا و احمدی اول، مرتضی، بررسی عوامل اثرگذار بر ارزیابی طرح های کارآفرینانه در شرکت های سرمایه گذاری خطرپذیر، توسعۀ کارآفرینی ، 2 (8)، ص 99-120. 1389. https://jed.ut.ac.ir/article_22824_7121adde477267a0237ca0aab8395b68.pdf#
12- درخشان، شهرزاد و محمدی، پرستو، اولویت بندی عوامل اثرگذار بر ارزیابی طرح های سرمایه گذاری خطرپذیر. مدیریت نوآوری، (3) 4، ص 22-34. 1393. http://www.nowavari.ir/article_14741_4d68710abb85f6a948e9b9e99420bd7d.pdf#
13- Levie, J., & Gimmon, E. Mixed signals: why investors may misjudge first time high technology venture founders. Venture Capital, 10(3), pp 233-256. 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691060802151820#
14- Bandarian, R. Enablers of Commercialization in Research Organizations. In proceeding of International Management Conference, 2005.#
15- شیری، اعظم. ارائه رویکردی جهت اولویت‌بندی روش‌های ارزشگذاری شرکت‌های دانش بنیان در ایران، پایان نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، موسسه آموزش عالی امام جواد (ع) یزد، 1397.#
16- Azar, A., & Faraji, H. Science of fuzzy management. Tehran. Nashre-e-Mehraban Publications, 2008.#
17- Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation.# European journal of operational research, 142(1), pp 174-186, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
18- Poudel. N , Syeed .MS, Ngorsuraches .S, Diaz .J, Chaiyakunapruk .N , HTA39 Characterization, Measurement, and Valuation of Attributes of Innovation of Technologies for Healthcare: A Systematic Review ,Value in Health, 25, 7, S510-S511, pp 1098-3015, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1171#
19- Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European journal of operational research, 142(1), pp 174-186, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6#
20- امیریان، سجاد و آذر، عادل، ارائه مدلی برای رتبه بندی سهام تحت محیط تصمیم گیری چند شاخصه فازی گروهی، نهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، تهران، 1390. https://civilica.com/doc/240990#