Presenting a digital entrepreneurship framework in Iran's road freight transportation industry
Subject Areas : Entrepreneurship and Mnagement of Knowledge-based Firms
Azam sadat Mortazavi kahangi
1
,
Parviz Saketi
2
*
,
Javad Mehrabi
3
1 - Department of Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 - Department of Educational Management and Planning, Shiraz University, Iran
3 - Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
Keywords: Entrepreneurship, digital entrepreneurship, road freight industry, design science,
Abstract :
The present research uses the research method of design science with the aim of designing a digital entrepreneurship framework in Iran's road freight transportation industry. This research is fundamental-applied in terms of data type, mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in exploratory type; according to the time of data collection, it was cross-sectional and according to the method of data collection or the nature and method of the research, it was a survey. The statistical society of the qualitative part of the research included 20 experts and specialists in the field of digital entrepreneurship and related industry, who were selected using theoretical saturation. In the quantitative part, using Cochran's formula and cluster sampling method, 170 employees of relevant industry were selected as samples. Semi-structured interview and researcher-made questionnaire were used to collect data, and its validity and reliability were checked and confirmed. Coding and systematic review of literature and Maxqda software were used to analyze the data in the qualitative part. In the quantitative part, one-sample t-test and structural equation modeling and SPSS and Lisrel software were used. In order to evaluate and test, the designed framework was studied in a company in related industry. results showed that the components of digital entrepreneurship in Iran's road freight transportation industry include structural, technical and developmental components Also, the affecting factors, consequences, platforms, facilitators, obstacles and strategies were presented in this framework. Also, the results showed that the research model has a good fit and all the identified factors are in a higher than average condition.
1. فاخر، غدیر؛ بهرام زاده، حسینعلی و برهانی، وجیهه، نقش فرهنگ کارآفرینی سازمانی در اقتصاد مقاومتی (مورد مطالعه: شرکت نمونه کارآفرینی کشور: آذین فورج)، پنجمین همایش ملی و چهارمین همایش بین‌المللی مهارت آموزش و اشتغال، سازمان آموزش فنی و حرفه ای کشور، تهران، 1395.
2. بنی اسددشتابی، فاطمه؛ ده یادگاری، سعید و پورسعید، محمدمهدی، طراحی یک اکوسیستم کارآفرینی دیجیتال برای کسب وکارهای الکترونیکی در ایران، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، 1400.
3. دیده خانی، حسین؛ علیزاده، روح اله؛ شریف‌زاده، محمدشریف؛ سمیعی، روح اله، کاربرد روش فراترکیب و دلفی در شناسایی مؤلفه ها و پیامدهای کارآفرینی دیجیتال. کارآفرینی در کشاورزی، 7(1)، 87-100، 1399.
4. براهویی، عبدالرحمن؛ آرامش، حامد و کمالیان، امین رضا، پیشران‌های توسعه کارآفرینی دیجیتال در اداره کل امور مالیاتی سیستان و بلوچستان، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان،1398.
5. فرد، ملیکا، تدوین مدل توسعه کارآفرینی دیجیتال در شرکت‌های دانش بنیان کوچک و متوسط. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد علوم انسانی، انشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشکده مدیریت، 1397.
6. میرکاظمی مود، محمد؛ محقر، علی؛ صادقی مقدم، محمدرضا، توسعه روش شناسی پژوهش در علم طراحی به منظور طراحی روشی برای مدلسازی سیستم های فنی-اجتماعی، پژوهش های نوین در تصمیم گیری, 4(2), 145-173، 2019.
7. Ndou, V., Del Vecchio, P., Mele, G. & Secundo, G., Creating value from Social Big Data: Implications for Smart Tourism Destinations, Inform. Process. Manag, 54, 847–860, 2018.
8. Kim, YK., Ryu, JE. & Choi, DS., Fabrication of graphene-magnetite multi-granule nanocluster composites for microwave absorption application, Journal of Composite Materials, 53, 4097-4103, 2017.
9. Yazdi Moghaddam, J., Khorakian, A. & Maharati, Y., Organizational Entrepreneurship and its Impact on the Performance of Governmental Organizations in the City of Mashhad, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015.
10. Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C, Entrepreneurial motivation and self-employment: Evidence from expectancy theory, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0441-z, 2018.
11. Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M., The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773, 2019.
12. Utoyo, I., Fontana, A., & Satrya, A., The role of entrepreneurial leadership and configuring core innovation capabilities to enhance innovation performance in a disruptive environment, International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(06), 2050060, 2020.
13. Tohanean, D., & Weiss, P., Digital Entrepreneurship and Green Business Model Innovation: Lean Startup Approaches, Quality-Access to Success, 2019.
14. Zaheer, H., Breyer & Y., Dumay, J., Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119735, 2019.
15. Miller, D., & Breton‐Miller, L., Underdog Entrepreneurs: A Model of Challenge‐Based Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 7-17, 2017.
16. Karimi, J. & Walter, Z., Corporate entrepreneurship, disruptive business model innovation adoption, and its performance: The case of the newspaper industry, Long Range Planning, 49(3), 342-360, 2016.
17. Pergelova, A., Manolova, T., Simeonova‐Ganeva, R., & Yordanova, D., Democratizing entrepreneurship? Digital technologies and the internationalization of female‐led SMEs, Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1) : 14-39, 2019.
18. Rothaermel, F., Agung, S. & Jiang, L., University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4). 631-731, 2007.
19. Hurley, A., Incorporating feminist theories in to sociological theories of entrepreneurship, Woman in Management Review, 14(2). 54-62, 1999.
20. O'Reilly, T., What is web 2.2: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, Communications & Strategies. 1.17, 2017.
21. Porter, M., Strategy and the Internet, Harvard Business Review, 2001.
22. Purbasari, R., Muttaqin, Z., & Sari, D. S., Digital Entrepreneurship in Pandemic Covid 19 Era: The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Framework, Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 10, 114-135, 2021.
23. Serinikli, N., Changing Entrepreneurship in the Era of Digitalization: Digital Entrepreneurship in Turkey, In Advanced Perspectives on Global Industry Transitions and Business Opportunities (pp. 154-174). IGI Global, 2021.
24. Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G., Digital Entrepreneurship: A Theory-Based Systematization of Core Performance Indicators, Sustainability, 12(10), 4018, 2020.
25. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. & Chatterjee, S., A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3): 45-77, 2007.
26. Wieringa, R. J., Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, 2014.