طراحی الگوی قطب نوآوری فناوری با استفاده از رویکرد مدل‌سازی تفسیری ساختاری ISM))
محورهای موضوعی : اکوسیستم‌های کارآفرینی و نوآوری
رمضان مهدی زاده
1
,
پرویز سعیدی
2
*
,
بابک ضیاء
3
,
احمد مهرابیان
4
1 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول
2 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول
3 - دانشگاه تهران
4 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول
کلید واژه: قطب نوآوری اکوسیستم نوآوری کارآفرینی فناورانه مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری الگو,
چکیده مقاله :
قطب نوآوری یک اکوسیستم تحقیق و نوآوری منحصر به فرد است. این یک محیط جهانی است که اعضای علمی با کیفیت بالا، محققان، دانشجویان، نوآوران و کارآفرینان را جذب می‌کند. قطب‌های نوآوری به‌عنوان اجزای ضروری توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی مبتنی بر دانش در سال‌های اخیر در اکوسیستم نوآوری در حال گسترش می‌باشد و در طول مکانیسم‌های رشد کسب‌و‌کارهای فناورانه مورد توجه سیاست‌گذاران علم و فناوری در کشورها قرار گرفته است. برای رشد نوآوری‌های فناورانه در کشورهای در حال توسعه نیاز به شناخت و درک عمیق‌تری از فرایندهای ساختارهای توسعه نوآوری می‌باشد تا در اجرا و الگو‌برداری، اثربخشی مطلوب حاصل گردد لذا پژوهش حاضر بدنبال این هدف است که الگوی قطب نوآوری فناوری چگونه است. در این پژوهش از روش آمیخته کیفی و کمی استفاده شد. پژوهشگران پس از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و مصاحبه با خبرگان عوامل کلیدی در ایجاد قطب نوآوری را شناسایی که شامل شش بعد شبکه و تعاملات اجتماعی، زیرساخت و منابع، وجود شرکت‌های نوآورانه و دانش‌بنیان، عوامل نهادی و تیم و ساختار شد. در این پژوهش با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی تفسیری ساختاری ISM، عوامل مؤثر بر ایجاد قطب نوآوری فناورانه بطور سطح‌مند، اولویت‌بندی گردید و روابط میان عوامل نیز محاسبه گردید. عامل تیم مدیریتی و ساختار با بیشترین نفوذ بر دیگر عوامل و کمترین وابستگی به آنها بیشترین تأثیر را در روابط میان عوامل ایجاد قطب نوآوری داشته است.
The Innovation Hub is a unique research and innovation ecosystem. It is a global environment that attracts high quality academic members, researchers, students, innovators and entrepreneurs. Innovation Hub as essential components of knowledge-based economic and social development in the innovation ecosystem have been expanding in recent years and have been considered by science and technology policymakers in countries during the growth mechanisms of technology businesses. For the growth of technological innovations in developing countries, it is necessary to have a deeper knowledge and understanding of the processes of innovation development structures in order to achieve the desired effectiveness in implementation and modeling, so the present study seeks to aim at how the Technology Innovation Hub modelis. In this study, a qualitative and quantitative mixed method was used. Researchers identified key factors in creating the innovation hub by library studies and interviews with experts. These factors included six dimensions of network and social interaction, infrastructure and resources, the existence of innovative and knowledge-based companies, institutional factors, team and structure. In this study, using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method, the factors affecting the creation of the Technology Innovation Hub were superficially prioritized and the relationships between the factors were calculated. The results showed that the management team factor and the structure with high degree of permeability and low dependence have had the greatest impact on the relationships between the factors.
1- Gow, J. I. Public Sector Innovation Theory Revisited, The Innovation Journal, 19 (2), 1-22, 2014. Available at: https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2014_19_2_1_gow_public-invoate-theory.pdf
2- Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C. & Chandy, R. K. Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), pp. 3–23, 2009. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003
3- Prabhu, J. The importance of building a culture of innovation in a recession. Strategic HR Review, 9(2), pp. 5–11, 2010. doi:10.1108/14754391011022208.
4- Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. Tech hubs, innovation and development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), pp. 95–118, 2017. doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1335282
5- Oksanen, K. & Hautamäki, A. Transforming regions into innovation ecosystems: A model for renewing local industrial structures. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19(2), pp. 2–17, 2014. Available at: https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/transforming-regions-into-innovation-ecosystems-a-model-for-renew.
6- Hwang, W. & Horowitt, G. The Rainforest: the secret to building the next silicon valley. Regenwald, Los Altos Hills, CA, 2012.
7- Durst, S. & Poutanen, P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems: A literature review. In R. Smeds, & O. Irrmann (Eds.), CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in Innovation Aalto University, 2013.
8- Rabelo, R. J, & Bernus, P. A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 28(3), pp. 2250–2257, 2015. doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.423
9- Waits M. J. Guidelines for Building an Innovation Hub, 2018. Available at: http://www.fora.org/Reports/Colloq/Panel_2_MaryJoWaits_121213.pdf
10- Shirazi, H., Hashemzadeh, G., Radfar, R., Torabi, T. The effect innovation capability on technology commercialization performance in knowledge based companies: The mediating role organizational innovation. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 2(3): 81-106, 2019. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2019.101025
11- enterari, Y., mahjub, H. Structural Analysis of the National Innovation Ecosystem: Utilizing Global Data for Iranian Policy Making. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 3(1): 87-118, 2020. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2020.207905.1221.
12- Adeli, O. A., Maghsoudi, H., Saeedi, A., & Bahrami, H. Dynamic Game between Science and Technology Institutions. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(2), pp. 55-70, 2020. {In Persian}. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.12.2.1209.
13- Mowery, D.C., Sampat, B.N. Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 209– 239, 2005.
14- Valero, A., Van Reenen, J. The economic impact of universities: evidence from across the globe. Econ. Educ. Rev. 68, 53–67, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.001.
15- Hicks, D. Performance-based university research funding systems. Res. Policy 41 (2), 251–261, 2012. doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
16- Datta, S., Saad, M. & Sarpong, D. National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, pp. 27-36, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.005
17- Etzkowitz, H. Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), pp. 115–128, 2002. doi:10.3152/147154302781781056.
18- McAdam, M., Miller, K., & McAdam, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50-51, 69–78, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002
19- Vila, C.P. & Page, J.L. New Environments Favourable to Innovation paradigmes issue no, 2008. Available at: www.gencat/cat/diue/doc/doc_25819940_3.pdf.
20- Naranjo-Valencia, Julia C. Calderón-Hernández, Gregorio. Building a culture of innovation. A proposal for cultural transformation, Management Studies, 31(135), 2015. http://ref.scielo.org/zd6pwq.
21- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), pp. 997–1008, 2017. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
22- Saad, M., Guermat, C., Brodie, L. National innovation and knowledge performance: the role of higher education teaching and training. The Journal of Higher Education Studies 4 (7), 1194–1209, 2015. doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881344.
23- Kwon, S., Motohashi, K. How institutional arrangements in the National Innovation System affect industrial competitiveness: a study of Japan and the US with multiagent simulation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 115, 221–235, 2017. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005
24- Sambuli, N. & Whitt, J.P. Technology innovation hubs and policy engagement, Making All Voices Count Research Report, Brighton: IDS, 2017. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/12860.
25- Subramaniam, G. What is the definition of an innovation hub? 2015. Available at: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-definition-of-an-innovation-hub.
26- Donovan, D., Larouche, T., Etzinger, B. & MacLennan, Christopher. Innovation Hub, CENTRAL INNOVATION HUB PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE, 2016. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/pco-bcp/documents/pdfs/inn-inn/rpt1_2016-eng.pdf.
27- Beer, J., De Millar, P., Mwangi, J., Nzomo, V. & Rutenberg, I. A Framework for Assessing Technology Hubs in Africa. NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 6(2), 2017. Available at: http://www.openair.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WP-2-Framework-for-Assessing-Technology-Hubs-in-Africa.pdf.
28- Petti, C. & Zhang, S. Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), pp. 7-25, 2011.
29- Petti, C. ed. Cases in technological entrepreneurship: Converting ideas into value. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
30- Ramazanpour Nargesi, Q., Davari, A. And Dehghan, A. The effect of intellectual capitals on competitive advantage with the mediating effects of technological entrepreneurship(Case study: Companies based in the incubators centers of Tehran). Journal of Technology Development Management, 5(2), pp. 41-61, 2017. {In Persian}. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2018.1898.1654.
31- Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), pp.95-101, 2012. sci-https://sci-hub.se/10.0000/www.iiste.org/Journals/EJBM/3007.
32- Spigel, B., (2015). The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp.49–72. doi:10.1111/etap.12167.
33- Holloway, I., & Todres, L. The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative research, 3(3), pp. 345-357, 2003.
34- Charan, P., Shankar, R., & Baisya, R. K. Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), pp. 512–529, 2008. doi:10.1108/14637150810888055.
35- Aloini, D., Dulmin, R. & Mininno, V. Risk assessment in ERP projects. Information Systems, 37(3), pp. 183–199, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.10.001.
36- Friederici, N. How Nascent Technology Entrepreneurs Organize: The Community Assembly Process, DRUID17, New York, USA, June 12-14, 2017. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3123804.
37- Sharma, S. K. & Meyer, K. E. Industrializing Innovation-the Next Revolution. Springer, Cham, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12430-4.
38- Carrincazeaux, C. & Gaschet, F. Regional Innovation Systems and Economic Performance: Between Regions and Nations. European Planning Studies, 23(2), pp. 262–291, 2014. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861809.
39- Fabrício, Jr. R., de, S., da Silva, F. R., Simões, E., Galegale, N. V., & Akabane, G. K. Strengthening of Open Innovation Model: using startups and technology parks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), pp. 14–20, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.051.
40- Ryan, P. & Giblin, M. High-tech Clusters, Innovation Capabilities and Technological Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Ireland. The World Economy, 35(10), 1322–1339, 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01486.x.
41- Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95-101, 2012. https://sci-hub.se/10.0000/www.iiste.org/Journals/EJBM/3007.
42- Bahemia, H. & Squire, B. A contingent perspective of open innovation in view product development projects. Druid summer conference on opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology, London, England, June: pp. 16-18, 2010. Available at: http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/628_IJAR-15109.pdf.
43- Stankovic, I. & Gocic, M. T. Forming of Science and Technology Park as an Aspect of Civil Engineering. Architecture and Civil Engineering, 7(1), pp. 57-64, 2009. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/22a9/ac140d21caa39b021d684bcfc612d4eb415d.pdf.
44- Hochberg, Y. V. Accelerating Entrepreneurs and Ecosystems: The Seed Accelerator Model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16, pp. 25–51, 2016. doi:10.1086/684985.
45- Saidi, T., de Villiers, K., & Douglas, T. S. The sociology of space as a catalyst for innovation in the health sector. Social Science & Medicine, 180, pp.. 36–44, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.015.
46- Jafar, A., Akbari, M., & Davari, A. The Effective Factors on the Formation of Innovation Clusters: The Case of Sharif Innovation District. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(1), pp. 1-14, 2020. {In Persian}. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.12.1.1119.