ارائه مدل مفهومی چابکی استراتژیک در سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری
محورهای موضوعی : مديريت تکنولوژي
1 - گروه توسعه کسب و کار - دپارتمان مدیریت فناوری
کلید واژه: چابكي راهبردي سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری ابعاد چابكي راهبردي مديريت راهبردي پژوهش و فناوری,
چکیده مقاله :
مديريت پژوهش و فناوری نيازمند رويكردهاي همه جانبه جامع‌تری به منظور حصول به راهبردهاي هماهنگ است. رويكردهاي جديد بايد بگونه‌اي باشند كه سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری را به يك پاسخ پیش‌کنشی به تغييرات موجود در محیط با تغییرات سریع فناورانه وادار نمايند. بنابراين سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری با توسعه ويژگي پیش‌کنشی در خود مي‌توانند به توانايي ويژه‌اي تحت عنوان «چابكي راهبردي» دست يابند. چابكي راهبردي به معناي توانايي اصلاح، نوسازي و بازآفريني سازمان، مدل‌هاي كسب و كار و راهبردهايش در راستاي تطابق با تغييرات محيطي است. در اين مقاله به‌منظور توسعه يك چهارچوب جامع و فراگير براي رسيدن به چابكی راهبردي در سازمانهاي پژوهش و فناوری، ابتدا كليه تحقيقات انجام‌شده در زمينه چابكي راهبردي در چند سال اخیر بررسي و پس از تطابق و تعديل آنها با ماهیت، ویژگی‌ها و الزامات سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری، در نهايت هفت بعد (عامل كليدي) و سي‌ويك شاخص برای چابكي راهبردي در سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری استخراج و تعریف گردید. اين هفت عامل كليدي؛ حساسيت راهبردي، چشم‌انداز واضح و روشن، انتخاب اهداف دانشی فناورانه راهبردي، شناسايي توانمندی‌های كليدي، تصاحب و بهره‌برداری، نوآوري فناورانه مستمر و پیش‌کنشی بودن مي‌باشند. مدل ارائه شده به‌طور توام با رويكرد درون و برون سازماني بوده و مبنايي براي سنجش چابكي راهبردي در سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری فراهم می‌آورد.
Research and technology management requires a more comprehensive holistic approach in order to achieve coordinated strategies. New approaches should force Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs) to proactive response to changes in the environment with the rapid technological changes. RTOs by development of proactive features on their interior can achieve to a special ability called "strategic agility". Strategic agility is the ability to reform, renovate and renewal the organization, business model and strategies to cope with environmental changes. In this paper, in order to develop a comprehensive framework to achieve strategic agility in RTOs, first, all of the previous research in the field of strategic agility in the last few years have been reviewed and then adapt and adjust to the nature, characteristics and requirements of RTOs, finally the seven dimensions (key factors) and thirty one index for strategic agility in RTOs extracted and has been defined. The seven key factors are strategic sensitivity, clear vision, selecting strategic technological knowledge goals, identifying key capabilities, seizing and exploitation, continuous technological innovation and being proactive. This model is based on the combination of both internal and external organizational approach, and provides the basis for the assessment of strategic agility in RTOs.
1- Börjesson, A., Mathiassen, L., (2005). Improving software organizations: agility challenges and implications, Information Technology & People, Vol. 18, Iss: 4, pp. 359 - 382.#
2- Ramasesh, R., Kulkarni, S., Jayakumar, M., (2001). Agility in manufacturing systems: an exploratory modeling framework and simulation, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 12 Iss: 7, pp. 534 - 548.#
3- Adeleye, E.O., Yusuf, Y.Y., (2006). Towards agile manufacturing: models of competition and performance outcomes, Internatinal Journal of Agile Systems and Management, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 93 – 110.#
4- Gunasekaran, A., (1999). Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development, Internatinal Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, Iss: 1–2, pp. 87–105.#
5- Miller, D., (1996). Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Iss: 7, pp. 505-512.#
6- Bustelo, D. V., Avella, L., Fernández, E., (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 Iss: 12, pp. 1303 – 1332.#
7- Yusuf, Y.Y., Sarhadi, M., Gunasekaran, A., (1999). Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concept and attributes, Internatinal Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, Iss: 1–2, pp. 33–43.#
8- Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., Preiss, K., (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.#
9- Sharifi, H., Zhang, Z., (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organization: an introduction, Internatinal Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, Iss: 1–2, pp. 7–22.#
10- Tallon, P. P., (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility, Information Technology and Management, Vol. 9, Iss: 1, pp. 21-36.#
11- Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., Chu, P. Y., (2006). Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 100, Iss: 2, pp. 285–299.#
12- Baker, P., (2008). The design and operation of distribution centers within agile supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 111, Iss: 1, pp. 27-41.#
13- Crocitto, M., Youssef, M., (2003). The human side of organisational agility, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 Iss: 6, pp. 388 – 397.#
14- Roth, A. V., (1996). Achieving strategic agility through Economies of Knowledge, Planning Review, Vol. 24 Iss: 2, pp. 30 - 36.#
15- Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., Grover, V., (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, Iss: 2, pp. 237-263 .#
16- Ojha, D., (2008). Impact of strategic agility on competitive capabilities and financial performance, Ph.D. thesis, CLEMSON UNIVERSITY. #
17- Doz, Y. L., Kosonen, M., (2010). Embedding Strategic Agility: A Leadership Agenda for Accelerating Business Model Renewal, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, Iss: 2–3, pp. 370–382.#
18- Morgan, R. E., Page, K. L., (2008). Managing Business Transformation to Deliver Strategic Agility, Strategic Change, Vol. 17, Iss: 92, pp.155-168.#
19- Setia, P., Sambamurthy, V., Closs, D. J., (2008). Realizing business value of agile IT applications: antecedents in the supply chain networks, Information Technology and Management, Vol. 9, Iss: 1, pp. 5-19.#
20- Arteta, B. M., Giachetti, R.E., (2004). A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 20, Iss: 6, pp. 495–503.#
21- Long, C., (2000). Measuring your strategic agility, Consulting to Management, Vol. 11, Iss: 3, pp. 25-28. #
22- Meredith, S., Francis, D., (2000). Journey towards agility: the agile wheel explored, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12, Iss: 2, pp. 137 - 143 .#
23- Priem R. L., Butler, J. E., (2001). Is the Resource-Based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 22-40 .#
24- Doz, Y., Kosonen, M., (2008). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience, California Management Review, Vol. 50, Iss: 3, pp. 95-118.#
25- Sull, D., (2009), How to Thrive in Turbulent Markets, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 87 Iss: 2, pp. 8-88.#