سیاست¬گذاری توسعه نوآوری باز: الزاماتی برای ایران
محورهای موضوعی : اکوسیستمهای کارآفرینی و نوآوریعاطفه ذوالفقاری 1 * , مرتضی اکبری 2 , شکوه سادات علیزاده 3
1 - جهاددانشگاهی
2 - دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی فناورانه، دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران. ایران
3 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت استراتژیک، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. تهران. ایران
کلید واژه: نوآوری باز, سیاست گذاری, هم آفرینی, شبکه سازی, بازار,
چکیده مقاله :
در سیستم نوآوری باز سازمان ها افزون بر ایده های درون سازمانی می توانند از ایده های بيرون از سازمان نیز بهره مند شوند. بدین ترتیب مرزهای بین سازمان ها و محیط های بیرونی آن نفوذپذیرتر می شود و در صورت سیاست گذاری مناسب برای توسعه نوآوری باز، امکان بهره برداری از امکانات سایر سازمان ها به طریق مناسب امکان پذیر می گردد. این پژوهش با مرور متون و مقالات و پژوهش های مرتبط با نوآوری باز و مباحث سیاست گذاری در امر نوآوری باز الزاماتی درخصوص سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در ایران در خصوص سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه توسعه تحقیقات و فناوری، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه شبکهسازی و تعاملات اکوسیستم نوآوری باز، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه کارآفرینی، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه علمی، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در هم آفرینی در دانشگاه ها، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه بازار کار، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در حوزه رقابتی، سیاست گذاری نوآوری باز در سطح بینالمللی را ارایه می دهد.
In the open innovation system, in addition to ideas within the organization, organizations can also benefit from ideas outside the organization. In this way, the boundaries between organizations and their external environments become more permeable, and if appropriate policies are developed for the development of open innovation, it will be possible to take advantage of the facilities of other organizations in an appropriate way. This research have been reviewed texts and articles and researches related to open innovation and policy issues in open innovation. Requirements for open innovation policy in Iran regarding open innovation policy in the field of research and technology development, open innovation policy In the field of networking and interactions of open innovation ecosystem, open innovation policy in the field of entrepreneurship, open innovation policy in the field of science, open innovation policy in co-creation in universities, open innovation policy in the field of labor market, Competitive Open Innovation Policy-Making Provides International Open Innovation Policy-Making.
اكبري، م. ذرهپرور، ا. پاداش، ح. علیزاده، ش. (1397). تأثیر نوآوري باز واردشونده و خارجشونده بر عملكرد نوآوري در شركتهاي فناورياطلاعات و ارتباطات. مدیریت توسعه فناوری. دوره 6، شماره 3، پاییز، صفحه 157-184.
داودی، ن. اكبري، م. پاداش، ح. (1395). شناسایی و اولویتبندی عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت نوآوری باز در شرکتهای فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (ICT). توسعه کارآفرینی. 9، (2 - شماره پیاپی )32، صفحه 239-256.
ذوالفقاری، ع. زند حسامی، ح. (۱۳۹۵). چشم انداز آینده نقش شبکه سازی در افزایش مزیت رقابتی از طریق نوآوری باز در کسب و کارهای کوچک و متوسط، فصلنامه رشد فناوری، (48)12، 63-58
سلون، پال. (2011). ترجمه مرتضی اکبری، پاداش، حمید. محسن محمدی (1394). راهنمای نوآوری باز و جمعسپاری. جهاد دانشگاهی. 311 ص.
چسبرو، ه. ونهاوربرک، دابلیو. وست، ج. (2017). ترجمه مرتضي اكبري، حميد پاداش، علي نيکونسبتي (1396). اُفقهاي جديد در نوآوري باز. دانشگاه تهران.454ص.
Al-Belushi, K. I., Stead, S. M., Gray, T., & Burgess, J. G. (2018). Measurement of open innovation in the marine
biotechnology sector in Oman. Marine Policy, 98, 164-173. Bird, B. (2002). Learning entrepreneurship competencies: the self-directed learning approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(2), 203-227. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086 Brockman, P., Khurana, I. K., & Zhong, R. (2018). Societal trust and open innovation. Research Policy, 47(10), 2048-2065.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621. Buganza, T., Chiaroni, D., Colombo, G., & Frattini, F. (2011). Organisational implications of open innovation: an
analysis of inter-industry patterns. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 423-455. Cai, Y., & Ahmad, I. (2021). From an Entrepreneurial University to a Sustainable Entrepreneurial University: Conceptualization and Evidence in the Contexts of European University Reforms. Higher Education Policy, 1-33. Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). From theory to practice: the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. Innovation, science, and institutional change, 141-160. Chatterji, A. K., & Fabrizio, K. R. (2014). Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation?. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1427-1445. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362-373. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 400, 0-19. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, K. (2006). Beyond hightech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries.
R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. Cricelli, L., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). Assessing the open innovation trends by means of the Eurostat Community Innovation Survey. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(3), 1-30.
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kalvet, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Policies for open innovation: Theory, framework and cases. Tarmo Kalvet. Deschamps, I., Macedo, M. G., & Eve-Levesque, C. (2013). University-SME collaboration and open innovation: Intellectual-property management tools and the roles of intermediaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3). Dogson, M., Gann, D. & A, S. 2006. The Roles of Technology in the Shift toward Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36, 333‐346. Eirma. (2004). Technology access for open innovation. Working Group Report WG63, Eirma: Paris Eisenhart, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21,
1105-1121. Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research policy, 43(5), 914-925. Fey, C., & Birkinshaw, J., (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31, 597-621. Fredberg, T., Elmquist, M., & Ollila, S. (2008). Managing Open Innovation Present Findings and Future Directions. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&d Management, 36(3), 223-228. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. Giannopoulou, E., Yström, A., & Ollila, S. (2011). Turning open innovation into practice: Open innovation research through the lens of managers. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(03), 505-524. Granstrand, O. (2007). Industrial innovation economics and intellectual property. Gothenburg, Sweden, Svenska Kulturkompaniet. Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. Princeton University Press. Grindley, P. C., & Teece, D. J. (1997). Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California management review, 39(2), 8-41. Herzog, P., & Leker, J. (2010). Open and closed innovation–different innovation cultures for different strategies. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 322-343. Hopkins, M. M., Tidd, J., Nightingale, P., & Miller, R. (2011). Generative and degenerative interactions: positive and negative dynamics of open, user‐centric innovation in technology and engineering consultancies. R&d Management,41(1), 44-60. Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&d Management, 12(1), 7-20. Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. (2013). Open innovation and organizational boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organizational theory, 355-382. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2005, August). The paradox of openness: appropriability and the use of external sources of knowledge for innovation. In Academy of Management Conference, Hawaii. Lee, J. Y., Park, Y. R., Ghauri, P. N., & Park, B. I. (2014). Innovative knowledge transfer patterns of group-affiliated companies: The effects on the performance of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 20(2), 107-123. Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model. Research policy, 39(2), 290-300. Lee, Y. G. (2012). Strengthening competency linkage to innovation at Korean universities. Scientometrics, 90(1), 219-230. Lee, Y. G., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Different characteristics between auctioned and non-auctioned patents. Scientometrics, 82(1), 135-148. Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). The collaboration of innovation intermediaries and manufacturing firms in the markets for technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 142-158. Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2006). Attitudes to externally organizing knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R&D Management, 36(4), 367-386. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of management studies, 46(8), 1315-1338. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. Mention, A. L. (2011). Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: which influence on innovation novelty?. Technovation, 31(1), 44-53. Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (2008). Innovation, the economy, and policy. Micro-foundations for Innovation Policy. O’Doherty, D., & Arnold, E. (2003). Understanding innovation: The need for a systemic approach. The IPTS report, 71, 29-36. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2008). Which kind of collaboration is right for you. Harvard business review, 86(12), 78-86. Poot, T., Faems, D., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2009). Toward a dynamic perspective on open innovation: A longitudinal assessment of the adoption of internal and external innovation strategies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 177-200. Prencipe, A. (2000). Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: the case of the aircraft engine control system. Research policy, 29(7-8), 895-911. Remneland‐Wikhamn, B., & Wikhamn, W. (2011). Open innovation climate measure: The introduction of a validated scale. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4), 284-295. Rinaldi, C., Cavicchi, A., Spigarelli, F., Lacchè, L., & Rubens, A. (2018). Universities and smart specialisation strategy: From third mission to sustainable development co-creation. International journal of sustainability in higher education. Roper, S., Vahter, P., & Love, J. H. (2013). Externalities of openness in innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1544-1554. Simcoe, T. (2006). Open standards and intellectual property rights. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 161, 183. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533. Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. Van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation–the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and innovation management, 16(2), 192-202. Van Elk, K., & van der Horst, R. (2009). Access to Standardization-Study for the European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2006). Open innovation in value networks. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 258-281. Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. New frontiers in open innovation, 281, 287-288. Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and innovation management, 17(4), 251-258. Von Hippel, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private‐collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management, 36(3), 295-306. Waiyawuththanapoom, N., Isckia, T., & Danesghar, F. (2013). Ready for open innovation or not? An open innovation readiness assessment model (OIRAM). Proceedings of International Coference of Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning, Washington, DC, USA, 465-472. West, J. & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R & D Management, 36(3), 319-331. West, J. (2006). Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation? Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 109-133. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. Zhu, X., Xiao, Z., Dong, M. C., & Gu, J. (2019). The fit between firms’ open innovation and business model for new product development speed: A contingent perspective. Technovation, 86-87, 75-85. Miremadi, S. I.. (2019). Technological Innovation System: a Scheme of Innovation Policy and Technology Development. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(2), 171-192. {In Persian}. Siadati, H., & Afshari Mofrad, M. (2019). Policies for Promoting Open Innovation. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(2), 379-393. {In Persian}.