Analysis of Start-ups Based on the Achievements of Academic Research from the Perspective of Resource-Based Approach
Subject Areas : Technology Management
Amin
Pazhohesh Jahromy
1
Javad
Pour Karimy
2
(University of Tehran)
Yaughob
Entezary
3
Amir Naser
Akhavan
4
Keywords: University-Based Start-ups Achievements of Academic Research Resources Resource-Based Approach,
Abstract :
The aim of this study is to analyze the achievements of university-based start-ups using resource-based approach and answers the question of why are some academic start-ups more competitive and may have greater survival. Academic entrepreneurs are involved in the early stages of business creation, with a decision on the funding crisis facing. The study of important factors decline young companies, often leads to a lack of resources in the early years of formation. The Awareness about the relationship between resources and their role on survival of academic research-based companies in the early years is critical. This article seeks to identify the relationship that leads to more accurately understand the phenomenon of the commercialization of academic research achievements. Since the structure of start-ups based on the achievements of academic research is not something different from the structure of other start-ups and one of three forms of service oriented, Product oriented and Intellectual asset oriented start-ups, the research using library research (Meta-synthesis), concludes that access to human resources and technology and enterprise resource scarcity on campus, explain the success of academic Service oriented and Intellectual asset oriented start-ups and the failure of Product oriented firms. This led to the establishment of academic Service oriented and Intellectual asset oriented start-ups.
1- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد (1394الف). دانشگاه کارآفرین و بیم و امیدها در اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان. فصلنامه علمی- ترویجی صنعت و دانشگاه. دوره 7، شماره 25، ص. 35-44.#
2- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد. (1394ب). تجاری‌سازی دستاوردهای تحقیقات دانشگاهی (دیدگاه تاریخی)، کنفرانس بین‌المللی جهت‌گیری‌های نوین در مدیریت اقتصاد و حسابداری.#
3- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد. (1394ج). موانع انتقال فناوری دانشگاهی: مفاهیم و نوع‌شناسی، کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی صنایع.#
4- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد؛ انتظاری، یعقوب؛ اخوان، امیرناصر. (1393). شرکت‌های مبتنی بر دستاوردهای دانشگاه (Academic Spin-off): مفاهیم، تعاریف و ویژگی‌ها، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی تجاری‌سازی فناوری، دانشگاه تهران.#
5- ادیزس، 1.، دوره عمر سازمان، ترجمه ک.م. سیروس، چاپ سوم، مرکز نشر دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، 1381.#
6- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد. (1394د). نقش اعتبار سازمانی دانشگاه و اثر هاله‌ای بر تجاری‌سازی دستاوردهای تحقیقاتی؛ پذیرفته شده برای انتشار در آخرین شماره نشریه علمی ترویجی رهیافت.#
7- پژوهش جهرمی، امین؛ پورکریمی، جواد. (1394ه). مطالعه عوامل مؤثر بر کارآفرینی دانشگاهیان، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی حسابداری و مدیریت.#
8- Ensley, M., & Hmieleski, K. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top manage¬ment team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups.Research Policy,No.34,1091-1105. #
9- Schwab, K. (2012).”The global competitiveness, Report 2013-2014”, World Economic Forum.#
10- Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp. 88–115.#
11- Hellman, T. and M. Puri, 2000b, ‘Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-up Firms: Empirical Evidence, Working Paper Stanford University,’ p. 44.#
12- Heirman, A.; Clarysse, B. (2004). "How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective", Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 29, pp. 247 – 268.#
13- Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory," Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 4-5, pp. 627-655.#
14- Brush, C. G.; Greene, P. G.; Hart, M. M. (2001). “From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 64-78.#
15- Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2001). The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After 1991. Journal of Management, No.27, pp. 625-641. #
16- Shane, S., Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 154–170.#
17- Karia, N., Wong, C. Y. dan Asaari, M. H. A. H. (2012). Typology of Resources and Capabilities for Firms' Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 65, pp. 711-716.#
18- Shepherd, D. A., and Wiklund, J. (2005). Entrepreneurial small businesses. A Resource-Based perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 12-42, 43-76.#
19- FAHY, J. (2000). “The Resource-based view of the Firm: Some Stumbling-blocks on the Road to Understanding Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 24, No. (2/3/4), pp. 94-104.#
20- Iturriaga, F., Cruz, N. (2008) 'Antecedents of Corporate Spin-Offs in Spain: A Resource- Based Approach', Research Policy, Vol. 37, 6-7, 1047–1056.#
21- Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.l.H. (1993). “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management journal, Vol. 14, pp. 33-46.#
22- Daft, R 1983. Organization theory and design. New York: West. #
23- Wernerfelt, B. (1997), A resource-based view of the firm, in: N. Foss (ed.), Resources, firms, and strategies: a reader in the resource based perspective, Oxford: Oxford.#
24- Porter, M. 1981. The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, pp. 609-620. #
25- Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No.1, pp. 99-120. #
26- Dollinger, M. (1995). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources. Boston: Irwin. #
27- Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997-1010. Hofer, C., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul: West Publ.#
28- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. P., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7, 509-533. #
29- Park, Seung-Ho; Lee, Yong-Gil. (2011). “Perspectives on technology transfer strategies of Korean companies in point of resource and capability based view”, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 161–184.#
30- Itami. H. Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University Press. Boston. MA. 1987.#
31- Runge, Wolfgang. (2014) "Technology Entrepreneurship: A Treatise on Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship for and in Technology Ventures. Vol. 2. KIT Scientific Publishing.#
32- Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.#
33- Lichtenstein, B. M. and Brush, C. G. (2001) ‘How Do “Resource Bundles” Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 37–59.#
34- Hall, Richard. (1993). “A framework linking intangible resources and capabiliites to sustainable competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp.607-619.#
35- Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, Vol. 33, pp. 114–135.#
36- Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 519-543. #
37- Nothnagel, K. (2008). Empirical research within resource-based theory. Germany Gabler.#
38- Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 41-56. #
39- Makadok, R. (2001). Towards a Synthesis of Resource-Based and Dynamic Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 5, 387-402. #
40- Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource Combinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 1193-1201. #
41- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 2, 171-180. #
42- Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness. American Sociological Review, Vol. 32, No.6, 891-903. #
43- Bergmann Lichtenstein, B., & Brush, C. (2001). How Do "Resource Bundles" Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 17-36. #
44- Grant, R. M. (2001). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc. #
45- Greene, P., & Brown, T. (1997). Resource Needs and the Dynamic Capitalism Typology. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12, No.3, pp. 161-173. #
46- Pride, W., Hughes, R., & Kapoor, J. (1991). Business. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. #
47- Renault, Thiago. (2010). “Business model analysis of technology based academic start-ups using resources based view”, Triple Helix VIII International Conference on University, Industry & Government Linkages. Available from: www.leydesdorff.net.#
48- Lee, C., K. Lee, and J.M. Pennings, 2001, ‘Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study of Technology-Based Ventures,’ Strategic Management Journal, No. 22, pp. 615–640.#
49- Stinchcombe, A.L., 1965, ‘Social Structure and Organizations,’ in J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand-McNally&Co, 142–194.#
50- Schoonhoven, C.B., K.M. Eisenhardt, and K. Lyman, 1990, ‘Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, No. 35, pp. 177–207.#
51- Zhang, j. (2009). The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data. journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 34, pp. 255-285. #