Identifying and Weighting the Factors Affecting the Role of Science and Technology Parks in Developing the National System of Innovation
Subject Areas : Science and Technology Parks and Incubators
saeid shavvalpour
1
*
,
majid forouzanmehr
2
,
Hamideh Heidari Ramsheh
3
,
Masoumeh Hesari
4
1 - University of Science and Technology
2 -
3 - Iran University Of Science And Technology
4 - University of Science and Technology
Abstract :
Science and technology parks are one of the most important innovations of innovational policy and have a special place in the development of the innovation system. System Attitude and Convergent Movement in Technology With the aim and thought of creating a new generation of universities and the scientific system to go to the system of innovation, for convergence should be formed in the country, and if speaking of an entrepreneurial university, along with it, science parks And technology and growth centers are in the innovation system. In this research, achieving success in strengthening the position of science and technology parks in the development of the national innovation system is a major issue. In this regard, more than one hundred agents in seven policy groups, financing research and innovation, providing knowledge in the innovation process, promoting technology entrepreneurship, disseminating and disseminating technology, developing and enhancing human resources, and producing goods and services , The initial identification is placed. The results indicate that policy indicators, funding for research and innovation, providing the necessary knowledge in the innovation process, and promoting technology entrepreneurship account for nearly 75% of the influential factors.
1- سلطانی، بهزاد، پژوهش و فناوری در نظام ملی نوآوری کشور، مجموعه مقالات پنجاه و یکمین نشست رؤسای دانشگاه ها و مراکز علمی و تحقیقاتی، 123، (1382).
2- امیر احمدی، هوشنگ، پارک های علم و فناوری؛ یک ارزیابی انتقادی، رهیافت، 10، (1374).
3- Anderson, N. et al., " The Reutilization of Innovation Research: A Constructively Review of the State-of-the-Science" Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 147-173, (2007).
4- Lin, H., Zeng, S.X., Ma, H.Y., Qi, G.Y., Vivian, W.Y.Tam, Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63-72, (2014).
5- Kanter R. The change Masters. London & NewYork: Routledge; (1995).
6- Alegre, J., Chiva, R., "Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An empirical test", Technovation,Vol.28, p.p.315-326, (2011).
7- Daft Richard‚ Bureauatic Versus Nonbureaucratic Structure and the process of innovation and change, (1998).
8- OECD :The Measurment Of Science And Technical ctivities: proposed Standard Practice For Surveys,Research And Experimental Development, (1998).
9- Caraca,J.M.G., Do Saber ao Fazer:porque organizer a ciencia,lisboa: Gardiva, (1993).
10- Mowery,D.C and N.Rosenberg, The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies, research policy ,Vol.8,no2, (1979).
11- Freeman, C., “Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons form Japan”, (1987).
12- Lundvall, B-A. “Innovation System Research: Where it Come From and Where it Might Go” 5th International Conference Globelics Russia, Saratov,Volga Region. Sep.20-23, (2007).
13- Freeman, G. and Soete, L. “Science Technology and Innovation Indicators In a Changing World, Responding to Policy Needs”, Paris : OECD, (2007).
14- Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., and Smits, R. E., Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion - a functional analysis. EnergyPolicy, 35, (2), 925-938, (2007).
15- Cristina, C., and Patarapong, I., Innovation system policies in less successful developing countries: The case of Thailand. Papers in Innovation Studies 2007/9, Lund University, and CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy, (2009).
16- Lundvall, B., “National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning”, (1992).
17- Nelson, Richard R., “National Systems of Innovation, A Comparative Analysis”, (1993).
18- Niosi;, J. P.-P. S., National systems of innovation: in search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15, 207–227, (1993).
19- Metcalfe, S., The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, in P. Stoneman, ed.,Handbook of Innovation and Tehnical Change,pp.409-512,Blackwell,London, (1995).
20- Cassiolato, I. And Lastres, H., “Local, National and Regional Systems of Innovation in the Mercosur”, (1999).
21- Dosi, G., Source, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.36, (1998).
22- Nelson R, Winter S. Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press; (1992).
23- Siegel, D., Westhead, P. & Wright, M. Science Parks and the Performance of New Technology-Based Firms: A Review of Recent U.K. Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research. Small Business Economics, vol. 20, pp. 177-184, (2003).
24- Hansson, F., Husted, K. & Vestergaard, J. Second Generation Science Parks: from Structural Holes Jockeys to Social Capital Catalysts of the Knowledge Society. Technovation, vol. 25, pp.1039-1049, (2005).
25- Bigliardi et al,. Assessing Science Parks’ Performance: Directions from Selected Italian Case Studies, Technovation, vol.26, pp. 489-505, (2006).
26- Squicciarini, M,. Science parks: seedbeds of Innovation? A duration Analysis of firms’ Patenting Activity, Small Bus Econ, vol. 32, pp.169-190. Doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9075-9, (2009).
27- Sanni, M., Egbetokun, A.A. & Siyanbola, w.o,. A Model for the Design and Development of a Science and Technology Park in Developing Countries. International journal and enterprise development, vol.8, No.1, pp 62-81, (2010).
28- Lofsten, H. Lindelof, P., "Science Parks in Sweden- Industerial Renewal and Development?" R&D Management. Vol 31.pp.309-322, (2006).
29- IASP/ International Association of Science Parks: Report of International Board on 6 February, available at: http://www.iasp.ws, (2002).
30- Saublens, et al,. Regional Research Intensive clusters and science parks, Available from: www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/rtdinfo/index_en.html, (2008).
31- Schereyer, P., Knowledge spillover and regional growth in Europe, (2002).
32- Li, J., High tech industries and competitive advantage in emerging markets: A study of foreign telecommunications equipment firms in china, (2000).
33- OECD, Science, technology and industry scoreboard: innovation and performance in the global economy, (2007).
34- Etzkowitz, H., The interpreneurial university and the triple helix as a development paradigm, (2006).
35- Anderseck, K, Institutional and academic interpreneurship: Implications for university governance and management, Higher education in Europe, (2004).
36- Cano, M, A literature review on interpreneurial universities: An Institutional approach, (2006).
37- Debackere , K, The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links, research policy, (2007).
38- Barrow, C., “Incubators: A realist’s guide to the world’s new business accelerators”. Wiley. West Sussex, UK, (2001).
39- O'Shea,R. J. Allen,T. O'Gorman,C. Roche,F., "Universities and Technology Transfer: A Review of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature." The Irish Journal Of Management. Vol 29.pp.11-29, (2006).
40- Nummela, N. Puumalainen, K. Saarenketo, S., "International Growth Orientation of Knowledge-Intensive SMEs". International Entrepreneurship Vol3. ,pp.5-18, (2005).
41- Stankovic, I. & Gocic ,Milan. trajkovic., Forming of Science and Technology Park as an Aspect of Civil Engineering. Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 7, No.1, pp. 57-64, (2009).
42- Vila, P.C. & Pages, J.L,. Science and Technology Parks: Creating New Environments Favourable to Innovation. paradigmes. issue no. 0.may Available from: www.gencat.cat/diue/doc/doc_25819940_3.pdf, (2008).